|Statement||edited by Timothy M. Shaw and Olajide Aluko.|
|Contributions||Shaw, Timothy M., Aluko, Olajide.|
|LC Classifications||DT515.8 .N524 1983|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||ix, 257 p. :|
|Number of Pages||257|
|LC Control Number||82025049|
Search within book. Front Matter. Pages i-x. PDF. Introduction: Nigeria as Africa’s Major Power. Introduction: Nigeria as Africa’s Major Power. Alternative Projections for Nigerian Foreign Policy. Front Matter. Pages PDF. Indigenisation in Nigeria: Renationalisation or Denationalisation? Thomas J. Biersteker. In investigating Obasanjo and Darfur, the book looks at Nigeria’s key foreign policy features under president Obasanjo which are Afrocentrism, personalization of decision-making and irrational decisions. The book examines Afrocentrism as a pillar in African countries foreign policies from the s and how it also shaped Nigeria’s foreign policy. Obasanjo was a significant proponent of Afrocentrism which also . Africa to be centre-piece of Nigeria’s foreign policy. His own foreign relations was pro-West particular with Britain, Nigeria’s erstwhile colonial master. With the bloody military coup of January, 15, , the late Major-General J.T. Aguisi Ironsi came to power only to be killed in . Nigeria has an ambitious foreign policy but an ambiguous, unscripted, not well defined and inconsistent national interest. Aside the fact that this is not good for a country that pursues an.
The Nigerian foreign minister insisted that it was incumbent on the Commonwealth to renounce its ‘unjust’ policy and rescind all punitive measures unequivocally. Having squared matters with CMAG, Nigerian officials could then dismiss a highly critical report on human rights in Nigeria, released by the UN General Assembly as CMAG prepared to Cited by: 2. The Abacha military regime that ruled Nigeria from 17 November to 8 June could well be summarized as a government that was involved in a perennial, if uneven, struggle with civil society organizations and the international community that wanted a rapid return to civilian and democratic rule. The Abacha junta, which was the arrowhead of the anti-democratic forces, prevailed, by Cited by: 1. Answers to the above questions and many clarifications on the basic plank of Nigeria’s foreign policy since the country gained political independence from Britain in will be provided to the. Nigeria is already in her 50 th year as an independent nation, and has been involved in all types of government and leadership in the past half a century. Being a milestone in the life of the country, a review of her foreign policy within the period is germane.
Since independence, with Jaja Wachuku as the first Minister for Foreign Affairs and Commonwealth Relations, later called External Affairs, Nigerian foreign policy has been characterised by a focus on Africa as a regional power and by attachment to several fundamental principles: African unity and independence; capability to exercise hegemonic influence in the region: peaceful settlemenyot of . Abegunrin provides a significant and comprenhensive examination of Nigerian foreign policy () during the almost 33 years of military rule, punctuated by the four-year civilian interregnum, He analyzes what led to the military rule in , 4/5(3). Using a decision-making system approach, this book presents many new facts about Nigeria's foreign policy dynamics and outputs through many governmental eras. It shows the Balewa Government as a period during which the Office of the Prime Minister played a dominant role in foreign policy formulation, while the Ministry of External Affairs clearly played a secondary role in this s: 1. Nigerian foreign policy. Lagos: Nigerian Institute of International Affairs in co-operation with Macmillan Nigeria Publishers, (OCoLC) Material Type: Government publication, National government publication: Document Type: Book: All Authors / .